Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, who was the victim C(52 years of age, women) committed a wrongful act with her husband D, who died on October 18, 2012, and proceeded with a civil lawsuit.

1. Around 20:00 on September 23, 2013, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s door-line business by finding the same as G within the “Fjuk point in the operation of the victim in Haju-si E” and obstructing the victim’s door-line business for a period of about one hour, namely, “In any case where a person who died of the franc, who died of the franc, died of the one year, knife with knife, and knife with knife.”

2. Around October 27, 2013, at the home of the Defendant, who called the victim’s cell phone, J, one-dong 808 (I apartment), from 14:27, 14:27, 2013, the Defendant threatened the victim by saying, “the homicide, dead, dead, dead, or dead, homicide,” who called the victim’s cell phone, “the victim’s cell phone.”

3. At around 11:00 on October 28, 2013, the Defendant found two persons, including G, at the places under the foregoing paragraph 1. Around 11:00, the Defendant openly insultingd the victim among two persons, including G et al., such as “in the event of being dead, dead, injured, and having to death in the year where he was born, and having to do so, and having to do so more than money.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A witness C and each legal statement of L;

1. Partial statement of witness G;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with Business, Selection of Fines), Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defense counsel regarding the defense counsel's assertion under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order shall be the defendant's counsel, and the defendant shall have a bad faith relationship with her husband at the date and place specified in paragraph