The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Summary of the facts charged in this case

A. On July 21, 2008, the Defendant forged private documents under the title “E” without authority for the purpose of exercising at the “E” office of the victim D’s “E” office located in Geum-gu, Busan. Around July 21, 2008, the ordering person: “Funk”;

2. The contractor’s name: “The First floor Fteine Project”;

3. Place of construction: “G 1st floor”;

4. Construction period: “from 21 July 2008 to 15 September 2008”;

5. Amount of contract: “Wil-il,000,000 won per day (Woo 115,000,000)”;

6. Terms and conditions for the payment of the price “Franchi: 30,000,000)”, “Franchi, 208, 25 July 2008,” “Franchi, 300,000 won (e.g., 60,000,000),” “Franchi, 15 August 2008,” “Franchi,000,0000 (e.g., 25,000,000),” “10% of value-added tax (excluding tax) on September 16, 2008,” “B” on the date of the conclusion of the contract, “I”: H203 101,001, f, name D: The name f, name f, and f: The name f, name e.g., name f., and f., name f., name f., name f. and f., name f., name J.

B. On December 2010, the Defendant, at the Busan District Court, filed an application for provisional seizure of the claim against F Co., Ltd., with the Busan District Court for the attachment of the claim, submitted the forged construction contract document to the court employee who may have knowledge of the fact that the contract was duly formed as described in the preceding paragraph.

2. The assertion;

A. On July 21, 2008, the Defendant and the Defendant, at the above C Office of D on July 21, 2008, entered into a contract for the construction of interior works on the first floor Fow of the old LA (hereinafter “instant building”) between D and D, and entered into the contract, and D directly puts his/her signature and seal on the said contract. Thus, the said contract is forged and used.