A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, each of the facts charged are acquitted.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant filed an application with the Gwangju District Court for the payment order of KRW 122,281 (which was subsequently reduced to KRW 7,902,621) against Company D, as the Gwangju District Court Decision 2009Hu5710, Dec. 12, 122,281 (which was later reduced to KRW 7,902,621) against Company D, and the Defendant was rendered a judgment against February 9, 2010 against the legal proceedings Gwangju District Court 2009Gada104969, which had been filed by the Defendant for the objection under the name of Company D, and filed the case of this case on September 10, 2010, for unjust enrichment against the victim on September 10, 2010, where the case was pending, the appellate court filed an appeal against the above judgment and sought payment of KRW 35,201,738.

1. On September 1, 2010, the Defendant used the aforementioned amount as supporting materials to prove the opposite evidence of the claim and the counterclaim in the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City's Office of Law of Law, Dong-gu, Gwangju Special Metropolitan City, for the purpose of using it as supporting materials for the counterclaim, 6 copies of the forged document under the name of the Co., Ltd. (i.e., "Won 32,00,01,580), (ii) receive the above amount on July 16, 2008, and prepare and affix this certificate in order to clarify the receipt and safekeeping of the above amount. The above amount was deposited from D as material price, but the victim promised to deposit the total amount of KRW 3,000,000 per annum and 10% of the penalty until September 10, 2008.

“The victim supplied goods equivalent to KRW 4,332,50 in total to D Co., Ltd. on June 25, 2008” as written statement 1 and 4.6.23, 2008.