logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2013.06.25 2013고단684
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The defendant shall pay 30,00 won to the applicant for the theft.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On August 27, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc., in the Gwangju District Court’s Branch Branch, on September 4, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 4, 2012, and the suspended sentence was revoked on June 19, 2013 on the ground of a violation of the matters to be observed by a

【1-1-1 of the facts of crime】

(a).

Paragraph (1) is the criminal facts of the case charged by Gwangju District Court 2013Ma871 on February 26, 2013 and transferred to this Court 2013Ma754. A.

At around 01:00 on the first day of December 2012, the Defendant discovered that, with D, E, and F, its windows were not corrected in the “I” restaurant operated by the victim H located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, and F entered the restaurant through windows, and the Defendants got 3 soldiers and 5 soldiers of the market value equivalent to 24,000 won in the victim’s market value by viewing the outside network.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property together with D, E, and F.

B. At around 06:19 on December 29, 2012, the Defendant, along with D, E, and F, opened an entrance and opened a door in a way that the victim K operated by the J of Simpo-si, and the Defendant and D opened the entrance so as to make it difficult for the Defendant to take off the entrance, and carried KRW 100,000 in cash, which is the victim’s possession in the safe.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property together with D, E, and F.

2 Paragraph 2 is the criminal facts of the case prosecuted for the violation of the Act on Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Act No. 2013Mo684.

The defendant is judged to be a clerical error in March 15, 2013, which was written in the indictment on March 15, 2013.

At 03:00, the victim N in Ma was operated by the victim N in Ma, and 2.30,000 won in cash, which was the victim's possession by intrusioning upon the locking device after breaking the locking device with a string method.

arrow