logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.06.05 2015고단398
아동복지법위반(아동학대)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

The defendant shall order the completion of the child abuse treatment program for 80 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

To the extent that it does not substantially disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense, the following facts charged are organized and recognized as follows:

The defendant is C (7 years of age), D (6 years of age), E (4 years of age).

1. The Defendant, in violation of the Child Welfare Act (child abuse), committed a emotional abuse that, on September 2014, by threatening the victim C, “I am out of the window,” and at the same time, “I am free of windows, I am free of the window,” and “I am free of the window, I am free of the window,” on the ground that the Defendant did not comply with the commitment that I am at the early 204 residence of the F apartment 204, the second son, the third son, and E, the son, who was the first son, did not follow the commitment that I will turn out of the window on three occasions a day.”

2. The Defendant violated the Child Welfare Act (child abuse) on February 21, 2015, on the ground that he did not properly study the victims in the residence specified in paragraph (1) at around 00, the Defendant committed emotional abuse, i.e., assaulting the victim C and E’s hair by cutting off the head of the victim C and E, continuing to do so, cutting off the victim D’s jackets on the left-hand end of the treatment days, cutting off the victim D’s jackets, and at the same time, engaged in both physical abuse and mental health and development that injure the victims’ physical health and development.

3. On February 12, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Child Abuse Crimes (Non-compliance with protective disposition, etc.) was determined to take ad hoc measures to enter C, D, and E’s residence (F apartment during the Gyeyang-si, 105 Dong Dong 204) up to April 11, 2015, but did not implement the said ad hoc measures until March 25, 2015 through the F apartment 105 Dong-gu F apartment and corridor 104 front of the front of the front of the 204 front of the front of the 204 front of the front of the 204 front of the 204 front of the front of the 204 front of the

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police officer with respect to G.

arrow