A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

On October 8, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Ulsan District Court for fraud, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 16, 2015.

"2015 Highest 2707"

1. Around November 26, 2010, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house located in Yangyang-si, Yangyang-si, Yangsan-si, submitted a loan agreement and a collateral security agreement to the victim D, who was unable to read the document, stating that “a document necessary to newly establish a house is to have the signature affixed thereon,” and made a false statement to the victim D, who was unable to read the document, while setting a maximum amount of KRW 90 million for the claim amount of KRW 195 square meters for the land owned by the victim, Daejeon-gu E-gu, Daejeon, which is the land owned by the victim, and made the victim sign the loan agreement and the collateral security agreement to the effect that the amount of KRW 60 million is to be loaned under the victim’s name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a loan contract under the name of the victim, which is a private document on rights and obligations, and a copy of a mortgage creation contract.

In addition, the Defendant took out a loan of KRW 60 million from the credit service provider F, who was aware of the forgery at an unsound place, and exercised the above-mentioned loan contract and one copy of the contract for creation of the right to collateral security as if it was duly formed.

2. Around April 28, 2011, the Defendant forged an application form for mobile phone subscription and the event was signed by the Defendant at the above Defendant’s home, stating “D” in the customer column for the application form for mobile phone subscription without the consent of the victim, and signing the application form in the following manner: (a) the Defendant entered “D” in the customer column without the consent of the victim; and (b) the Defendant signed the application form in the following manner.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a letter of application for subscription to mobile communication in the victim's name, which is a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

In addition, the defendant is not aware of the forgery.