logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.07.26 2018고단1639
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 3, 2009, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 500,000,000,000 as fines for the same crime from the same support on October 13, 2017 to the same crime under the Road Traffic Act, in a case where the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving without a license).

On February 1, 2018, the Defendant: (a) driven a vehicle B while under the influence of alcohol with 0.082% alcohol concentration in blood without obtaining a driver’s license from around 100 meters in front of the cafeteria to the 100-day road in the same city-based 992.

Therefore, even though the Defendant violated the duty of prohibition of drinking driving under the Road Traffic Act not less than twice, the Defendant was driving a car without obtaining a driver's license under the influence of re-driving.

2. On February 1, 2018, the Defendant: (a) driven a motor vehicle in the C Building parking lot in light of the circumstances described in the above paragraph (1) on February 1, 2018; (b) had a police officer affiliated with D, the Gyeonggi Mine Police Station D, under the influence of drinking control; (c) requested F, the Defendant’s driver’s license and driver’s license and driver’s license and driver’s license to the effect that the said F, on behalf of the Defendant, made the statement that he was driving; (d) the F, on the same day, requested F, to make a false statement to the effect that the F, other than the Defendant, driven the said franchise and drive the motor vehicle on behalf of the said E; and (d) had F, on the same day, made F, a false statement to the effect that the F, who was not the Defendant, had the said E drive the motor vehicle on behalf of the alcohol measurement.

As a result, the defendant instigated F to escape a person who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written prosecutorial statements of the F;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect with respect to F;

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol;

1. Previous conviction: Application of inquiry, inquiry, report on investigation (report on the same criminal record and confirmation of the suspect) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow