logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2019.06.20 2018나9985
매매대금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The main issue of this case is whether the plaintiff and the defendant agreed to pay the purchase price of this case with the loan provided as security to the E Forestry Cooperatives, and whether the contract deposit of 27 million won, which is the estimated amount of compensation for damages under the sales contract of this case, is unfairly excessive. The reasons for this court's explanation are as follows: except for the rejection of each voice of Gap evidence Nos. 6 through 8, which is insufficient to reverse the facts of the first instance court's approval as evidence submitted by the plaintiff in the trial, the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is the same as the statement of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow