logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.18 2017나86813
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants and the incidental appeals by the Plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal and the incidental costs thereof shall be individually considered.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain in this case are stated in this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the rejection of the testimony by the witness of the court of first instance who is insufficient to reverse the facts of recognition of the judgment of the court of first instance as evidence submitted in the court of first instance as “the date of pronouncement of the judgment of the court of first instance” and added by “the date of pronouncement of the judgment of the court of first instance” as “the date of pronouncement of the judgment of the court of first instance,” and therefore, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable. Thus, the appeal by the Defendants and the incidental appeal by the Plaintiffs are dismissed as they are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow