Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
The main issue of this case is whether the validity scope of this case's agreement is limited to the tax already imposed in the circumstance that the defendant agrees to assume responsibility for the reason that the amount of false sales of the gas station in this case is excessive compared to the actual purchase amount, and whether it includes the tax to be imposed in the future due to the existing false sales report. The reason for this court's explanation is as follows, except for the rejection of each statement of No. 14 through No. 18 of the evidence submitted by the defendant as evidence submitted by the defendant in the trial of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is identical to the part of the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.