Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On December 27, 2016, at around 16:30, the Defendant committed assault against the victim, on the ground that the victim was a customer to enter a G restaurant operated by the Defendant at the victim’s side store store store, on the ground that the victim was a customer to enter the G restaurant operated by the Defendant at the victim’s side store store, while taking a bath, the Defendant committed assault against the victim of the flusing materials containing the flusing materials that the Defendant was the Defendant’s own store.
2. Determination
(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act;
(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 260 (3) and (1) of the Criminal Act;
(c) Un original intent to punish: A victim E who appears as a witness on the third trial date ( August 25, 2017) after the prosecution of the instant case was instituted, clearly expresses his/her intention not to punish the Defendant under an agreement with the Defendant.
(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;