1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against Defendant C and Puuer Construction Co., Ltd. against each of the Defendant U.

1. In the first instance trial, the Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the Defendant U.S. seeking approval of cancellation of the registration of ownership transfer due to each contract for sale in lots, ② R’s registration procedure for cancellation of ownership transfer registration with respect to the Defendant International Asset Trust, ④ registration procedure for cancellation of ownership transfer registration with respect to the Defendant Savings Bank, ④ registration procedure for cancellation of ownership transfer registration with respect to the Defendant Savings Bank, ⑤ Defendant Savings Bank, Defendant New SPSSC, Han Bank, the succeeding intervenors of the Defendant Han Bank, and the Defendant T, and ④ declaration of consent to cancellation of ownership transfer registration with respect to the registration of cancellation of ownership transfer registration.

The judgment of the first instance court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiffs except for the part concerning the part concerning the real estate 6, 7, and 28, 31, listed in the Plaintiff C’s attached real estate list in the Plaintiff’s attached real estate list in U.S. and the part concerning the real estate 28, 31, and the part concerning the part concerning the real estate 6, 6, and

However, with respect to the part concerning Plaintiff C’s real estate 6, 7, and the part concerning Plaintiff C’s real estate 28, and 31 real estate indicated in the above list of Plaintiff Puuer Construction, the above judgment against the Plaintiffs was rendered, respectively, and the judgment against the Plaintiffs regarding Defendant Savings Bank, Defendant Savings Bank, and New SPC in the whole and part of Plaintiff Puer Construction (Dismissal of Request) and the part regarding Plaintiff C’s real estate 28, and 31 real estate indicated in the above list of Plaintiff Puer Construction (Dismissal of Request).

As to this, only the plaintiffs appealed against the part of the judgment against Defendant Savings Bank, Defendant New S&C, Defendant International Asset Trust, Defendant Han Bank’s succeeding intervenors, Defendant T, and Defendant U.S., the scope of the trial on the party’s trial is as follows: ① As to the part of the judgment, the scope of the trial on the party’s trial is as to Defendant U.