1. On the plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) among the judgment of the court of first instance, including participation in succession made at the court of first instance.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows. Since part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act is citing the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, “BC” of No. 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance as “BM,” and “lease 1 through No. 7” of the judgment of first instance is removed as lease relation. The remaining plaintiffs except the plaintiffs AB, H, and AL are part of the co-owners of the building of this case, and the defendant 2 and the plaintiff 4 were the owners of the building of the building of this case, and the plaintiff 2 were the owners of the building of the building of this case who succeeded to the ownership of the building of this case, and the plaintiff 1 and the successor to the building of this case were to purchase the shares of the plaintiff 5 and the successor to the building of this case from the plaintiff 2 and the successor to the building of this case from the plaintiff 1 and the successor to the building of this case 47.7.