logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2012. 07. 26. 선고 2011누1040 판결
매수자로부터 양도소득세 등의 명목으로 금원을 지급받은 것으로 인정되므로 양도가액에 포함됨[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Changwon District Court 2010Guhap3402 (O1, 2011)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High Court Decision 2010Du0423 (Law No. 29, 2010)

Title

Since it is recognized that it received money from the purchaser as the name of capital gains tax, etc., it is included in the transfer value

Summary

(1) In full view of the fact that the purchaser agreed to bear part of the capital gains tax at the time of real estate sale and the fact that the purchaser received the key amount from the purchaser, etc., the key amount shall be deemed to have been paid by the purchaser. As such, the transfer value of real estate shall be included therein.

Related statutes

Article 96 of the Income Tax Act

Cases

(C)The revocation of the disposition imposing capital gains tax, etc.

Plaintiff and appellant

XX

Defendant, Appellant

Head of Jinju Tax Office

Judgment of the first instance court

Changwon District Court Decision 2010Guhap3402 Decided September 1, 2011

Conclusion of Pleadings

June 7, 2012

Imposition of Judgment

July 26, 2012

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant shall revoke the disposition of imposition of capital gains tax of KRW 000 against the plaintiff on August 14, 2009.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reason for this court's opinion concerning this case is that "the check of Chapter 112 of the first instance court's 4th 12th 12th th 11th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th 200 th th th th th th th th 200 th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow