Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for eight months, each of the defendants B.

Defendants 1 and 2 of this title.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A’s sole criminal defendant made a false statement that he/she would contact the victims who posted an article describing the method of borrowing a loan on the Internet site to allow them to borrow a business, and then received a cell phone device in the name of the victims and received it to acquire it by fraud.

On February 27, 2012, the Defendant told the victim E to “a general loan will take place by opening a cell phone from a person who bears a burden,” and that “a principal loan will take place by opening a cell phone from a person who bears a burden.”

However, even if the defendant received a cell phone call from the victim in the name of the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to normally lend the loan to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant deceiving the victim and received approximately KRW 1,00,000 of the market price from the victim on the same day from May 11, 2012, and, from that time, by deceiving the victims indicated in the same Table seven times in the same manner from May 11, 2012, and received approximately KRW 13 mobile phones of the market price of KRW 10,584,00 in total from the victims in the attached list of crimes in the same manner. By deceiving the victim F, the Defendant did not intend to receive a cell phone of approximately KRW 850,00,00 in the market price by deceiving the victim F, but did not bring the victim F to the police and did not commit an attempted crime.

2. 피고인들의 공동 범행 피고인들은 인터넷 사이트에서 급전 및 소액 대출을 필요로 하는 사람들을 찾아내어 대출을 원하는 피해자들에게 아파트 분양권을 따서 대출을 해 주겠다고 접근한 후 피해자들 명의로 아파트 분양권 및 대출금채무를 승계하게 한 다음, 피해자들을 대신하여 분양권 매도자들이 지급하는 중도금후불이자나 시세감소액(속칭 마이너스 프리미엄)을 가로챌 것을 마음먹었다. 가.

On February 28, 2012, Defendant A committed fraud against Victim E.