Defendant

A and C Imprisonment for eight months, each of them shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

"2013 Highest 1088"

1. Joint criminal conduct by Defendant A and B;

A. Defendant A, the president of K, Defendant B, and the Defendants, at the K meeting on the date on which the date cannot be known on December 31, 2009, instructed that the Defendants, as members of the K meeting, a veterinarian, bid bid for L, M, NO, P, Q, R, S, and T (hereinafter “L, etc.”) and U projects ordered by Sungnam-si in 2010, to proceed with the same as the successful bid, and notify each of them of the bid bid price and to comply with the bid price set in advance.

Accordingly, on December 31, 2009, the Defendants participated in the bidding for the service entrusted to the Internet Public Procurement Service by accessing the Internet Public Procurement Service site in 2010 by using a computer to enter into the bidding for the service entrusted to the Internet Public Procurement Service site in 2010, and Defendant A entered the bidding at around 10:57, and KRW 44,725, respectively; Defendant B entered the bidding at around 11:31; KRW 45,153; KRW 10:4; KRW 10:4; KRW 10:30; KRW 10:30; KRW 44,565; KRW 10; KRW 10:5 KRW 4,56; KRW 10:5 KRW 10; KRW 464,63; KRW 10:54,63; KRW 10:465; KRW 108:4; KRW 1054; KRW 4655; KRW 1945; KRW 1545,505.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with the above L, etc., thereby harming the fairness of bidding by fraudulent means.

B. Defendants in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) continued to carry out the project by receiving or participating in the bid for the WW project ordered at Sungnam-si from 2007 to 2010, and by obtaining a successful bid from part of its members, and jointly conducting the project. However, as X, a new plant, was unable to carry out the project in 201 upon receiving a successful bid for the project, the said X’s representative, etc. will be threatened with money and valuables.