A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 11, 2017, the Defendant reported 112 at “D cafeteria” located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon on December 11, 2017, and called “F, a police officer belonging to the Incheon Samsan Police Station E District, who was dispatched.”

Dr. A few times of suicide.

C. C. H. H. H. H. H. H. assaulted F’s body two times by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment of cell phone image data taken by the police officer of the dispatched police officer);

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following sentencing shall be taken into account, etc.):

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order and the reason for sentencing [the scope of recommendations] The scope of punishment under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code [the scope of punishment] where the degree of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, or obstruction of official duty is minor (the decision of sentence] is minor (the decision of sentence] one time in the previous case, but the degree of interference with official duty is minor, as seen in the above sentencing factors, minor, defendant is against the defendant, and contingent crimes are considered.