Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. 업무 방해 피고인은 2018. 7. 2. 17:20 경부터 같은 날 17:50 경까지 용인시 기흥구 B에 있는 피해자 C이 운영하는 D 식당에서 피해 자로부터 목소리를 낮춰 달라는 요구를 받자 화가 나 “ 씨발 년 아, 내가 뭘 잘못했냐,

n Doz. Doz.

“Before doing a bath, it interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by putting the disturbance on the cafeterias, by putting the customers who had been on the cafeterias, such as breaking the cream on the table, breaking the chills, breaking the chills, leaving the cafeterias, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties may not calculate the amount without calculating it to C, a defective restaurant operator, who is a defective restaurant, as in the time and place of the preceding paragraph, where one person was in a disturbance as in the preceding paragraph, at the same time and place.

“If “,” he was difficult to avoid disturbance, and the police officers belonging to the Gyeonggi-do Police Station E District Team of the Gyeonggi-do Police Station E District of the Gyeonggi-do Police Station, called upon 112 reported, went out of the restaurant, putting the above F F’s right shoulder, which prevents him from entering the restaurant while being forced to enter the restaurant.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and C;

1. Five copies of the photograph;

1. Emergency medical records and certificates of medical treatment;

1. A CD containing CCTV images taken by a police officer dispatched to the scene and CCTV images taken by a witness;

1. Images of CCTV images taken by a police officer dispatched to the scene;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (a testimony of a wooden person and verification of images of witnesses);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the choice of each fine (the fact that there is no record of criminal disposition other than confession, reflectivity, and one-time punishment by a fine, etc.) concerning criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.