The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Indictment

1. Around January 15, 2012, the Defendant: (a) referred the victim D(56) of the victim D(E) in Pakistan-si; (b) referred the victim F to F; and (c) damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by publicly pointing out that “Arrecing the extension of the token is difficult; (d) the head of the house has a large amount of the horse; and (e) the head of the house in Korea has a large amount of money. There was a large amount of money in this Section; (e) whether there was a book of other male workers; (e) whether there was a large amount of money for other male workers; and (e) whether there was a large amount of money in Korea and our spouse having a sexual relationship.”

2. At around 15:00 on February 26, 2012, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by stating, “I, F, and J in the dwelling area of H, I, and I, a conversation with H, I, F, and J.”

However, this case is a crime falling under Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.