All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. Facts charged;

A. Defendant A1) around 14:00 on December 7, 2017, the Defendant referred the victim E, a volunteer fire fighting commander, in the D Fire Station conference room located in Gangwon-gu, to approximately 40 members of the D Women’s volunteer fire fighting unit in the D Fire Station meeting room located in Gangwon-gu, and the fact was that the victim used the volunteer fire fighters during the process of obtaining a social worker qualification certificate, despite the absence of the fact that the victim used the volunteer fire fighters, the Defendant used the members of the E Fire Fighting unit.

“The victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts by speaking to the purport that it is “.”

2) On December 2017, the Defendant embezzled public funds without using the books for six months, even though there was no fact that the injured party embezzled public funds for his own fire brigade, while the fact that the Defendant referred to the Victim E was embling from the 2nd car page of the 2nd class of the 2nd class of the 2nd class of the 2nd class of the 2017 police officer.

“The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

B. On November 2017, 2017, Defendant B referred to the Victim E as the “victim E,” when the victim was not a public fund for his own fire brigade, even though the victim did not have any shares as a public fund.

“The victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out false facts by speaking to the purport that it is “.”

2. Determination and conclusion of the facts charged in this case are crimes falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent in accordance with Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act.

On June 26, 2018, after the prosecution of this case, the victim prepared a written withdrawal of complaint to the effect that he/she does not want the punishment of the Defendants and expressed his/her wish not to punish the Defendants. As such, all of the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.