Punishment on the accused shall be determined by a fine of KRW 500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

On March 28, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on March 28, 2013 by interfering with business affairs in the Daejeon District Court's Incheon District Court's Branch, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on April 23, 2015.

On April 12, 2013, at around 13:30 around 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the on-site tour of the members of E Co., Ltd., the head of E Co., Ltd., the E Co., Ltd. F, the head of E Co., Ltd. (51 tax) affiliated with E Co., Ltd., the Defendant: (b) obstructed the field tour of the members of E Co., Ltd.; (c) taken the site using a mobile phone; (d) in the situation where the members of Eins are surrounding the victim, the Defendant saws tobacco smoke to the face of the victim immediately before the victim’s face; and (d) demanded that “the victim s/he s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/ s/

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. No. 3 (records) and No. 4 (a photograph by capturing the same image);

1. Application of a reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, and the text of the judgment (latter concurrent relationship) in Part III;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds of sentencing of the instant crime, the form and degree of the instant crime, the records of the criminal punishment of the Defendant, the recognition of the Defendant’s criminal act, and the obstruction of business affairs as indicated in the judgment at the same time, equity in the case of concurrent judgment, and other circumstances shown at the instant trial, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, background of the crime, and relationship between the Defendant and the victim, etc., shall be determined as ordered