beta
Text
1. The defendant is innocent. 2. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
Reasons
On April 16, 2015, the Defendant, at around 18:15, 2015, committed assault, such as: (a) the Defendant, upon receiving a demand from E, a police officer belonging to the Seongbuk-gu Police Station D District of the Sungnam Police Station, who was engaged in patrol service, “Sking a taxi parked in a zone where parking and stopping is prohibited; (b) the Defendant was able to take the fluorous tobacco into the fluor, “I am fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor fluor flu
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on traffic control.
Judgment
An assault in the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties shall not be directly, indirectly, or indirectly, an act of exercising illegal tangible power against a public official, but such an assault shall be likely to interfere with the execution of official duties by nature.
The following facts are recognized in full view of the evidence submitted by the defendant, including black images installed in a taxi operated by the defendant:
1) The Defendant set up a taxi at the corner, which is a zone where parking and stopping is prohibited, and avoided tobacco outside the corner. 2) Police Officer E and F, who was on patrol, discovered it and demanded the Defendant to immediately move the vehicle, and the Defendant did not answer to the purport that he would regulate dys only.
3) However, while the Defendant thought that he had expressed his desire to do so, and the Defendant had no desire to do so, the Defendant was satisfing with each other, and the Defendant was satched with each other, and the Defendant was satched once again, and the Defendant was satched with tobacco. 4) The Defendant was satched with the Defendant’s fat, and the Defendant was satched against this, and the Defendant was satched with the Defendant, but the police officer F was satf.