A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was a person who operated Otoba in order to deliver insurance money by driving the Otoba, in collusion with the friendships or postship who are engaged in the delivery service among the people of the defendant's will, in order to intentionally cause a traffic accident or to obtain insurance money by pretending to a traffic accident by fraud.

1. The defendant, who committed a joint crime with C, committed a traffic accident under the presumption of a traffic accident, as if he/she had a pedestrian shock by using a delivery error for delivery to friendly C;

The proposal and C conspired to acquire insurance money together with the consent thereto.

On October 31, 2011, around 21:40 on October 31, 201, the Defendant was working for the Defendant even though he did not have any traffic accident.

D. The phone call from the head of the point to “the defendant caused a traffic accident that leads to pedestrians while driving a 49cc wheel and delivering a 49cc wheeled vehicle,” making him/her receive an accident in the Non-Life Insurance Co., Ltd., and C received hospital treatment by pretending that he/she was faced with the Defendant’s ozone.

Accordingly, in collusion with C, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and paying 650,000 won to the Korean bank account on December 8, 2011 from the victim who was affiliated with C, and on the same day, acquired 682,690 won in total of insurance money by having the E hospital pay 32,690 won for medical expenses.

2. That the defendant who committed a joint crime with F and G is a person who has withdrawn insurance money in disguise of a traffic accident as if he/she had shocked pedestrians using a delivery obane to friendly F and G;

In addition, F and G have proposed to acquire insurance money together with consent thereto.

around 22:30 on November 201, 201, the Defendant, along with F and G, was unable to drive a HEAVV 125 dual-wheeled vehicle by phoneing to an employee who he/she had a part-time accident, while driving a HEV 125 dual-wheeled vehicle.