beta
Text
Defendant
A and B Each fine of KRW 3,00,000, KRW 6,000, KRW 000, KRW 3,000, KRW 3,000, KRW 3,000, KRW 8,000, KRW 3,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B On August 5, 2014, at the Incheon District Court, sentenced two years of suspended sentence to six months of imprisonment for fraud, which became final and conclusive on August 13, 2015.
1. Defendant D, Defendant C, and F’s co-principal offender D proposed that Defendant C and F, a next high school, receive insurance proceeds by fraud as if a traffic accident occurred, and the F and Defendant C conspired to receive insurance proceeds by fraud. The F and Defendant C conspired to obtain the insurance proceeds by fraud.
Defendant
C and F, according to the above public offering on July 5, 2008, calculated at 4:45,00 in Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, Gyeyang-gu, and the latter part of the road. The facts are as follows: Defendant C received traffic accidents from the victim Mzz fire marine insurance corporation in a false manner, even though Defendant C did not receive F due to Oralba, and it received KRW 919,320 under the pretext of agreement, etc. from July 9, 2008 to July 10, 2008.
Accordingly, in collusion with F, Defendant D and C acquired 919,320 won from the victim.
2. Defendant D, Defendant C, G, H, and I’s co-principal offender D intentionally paid a traffic accident to Defendant C, G, and friendly job offer I, who is a senior high school, proposed the acquisition of insurance proceeds by receiving the accident from the insurance company. Defendant C, G, and I consented thereto, and G conspired to obtain insurance proceeds by participating in the accident as the other party to the accident.
Defendant
D. On November 21, 2008, at around 17:48, 2008, according to the above public offering with G, I, and H, D, and C received a traffic accident from a marine insurance company for the modernization of the victim on the same day even though H was driven by Oraba, and Defendant C and G was partly driven by Orababa, which was driven by H, but the victim was able to receive insurance money from the victim. However, the occurrence of the crime and the cancellation of the receipt was caused by the awareness of the crime.
3. Defendant D, Defendant C, G, and.