A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2016. 12. 18. 03:20 경 서울 마포구 C 앞 도로에서, 피고인이 술에 취해 넘어져 있다는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 서울 마포 경찰서 D 지구대 소속 경찰관 E, F에게 부축 받아 걸어가던 중, 갑자기 발로 위 E의 정강이 부위를 1회 걷어차고 손으로 E의 멱살을 잡아당기고, 이에 위 경찰관들 로부터 현행범으로 체포되자 발로 위 F의 정강이를 1회 걷어 찼다.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the police officers' legitimate execution of their duties on the protection of the people's body and criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Police statements made to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of the recommended sentence] and the reason for obstructing the performance of official duties shall be determined within the scope of the recommended sentence and the execution of the sentence shall be suspended, taking into account the following: (a) there is no basic area (from June to April 1) (the person who has been subject to special sentencing] [the decision of sentencing] (the decision of sentencing is divided by a defendant; and (b) there is no serious damage to police officers, etc.