logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.07.06 2018고단601
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 16, 2018, at the front corridor No. 101, 407, B apartment house No. 101, 407, 2018, the Defendant reported to the police officer who was urged to return home from police officers, such as D et al., the circumstances in which the Defendant belonged to the police station Cr., and called out, after receiving a report that the Defendant caused disturbance, such as leaving the front door door and leaving the front door, the Defendant reported to the police officer that he would return home.

C Ma Mab Mab Mab Maba, Dob Hab Hab Haba

”라고 욕설을 하면서 경위 D의 멱살을 잡고 그의 얼굴에 침을 뱉었 다. 이로 인하여 위 경위 D 및 순경 E에 의하여 공무집행 방해 현행 범인으로 체포되자 이에 저항하면서 발로 위 경찰관들의 하체를 수회 걷어찼고, 경위 D의 얼굴에 다시 침을 뱉었 다. 결국 피고인은 위와 같이 경찰관들을 폭행하여 그들의 치안유지 및 범죄수사에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 각각 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. The degree of interference with the execution of official duties, including the same kind of criminal records, multiple criminal records are used, while the defendant is against the defendant, the police officers D who suffered damage does not want the punishment against the defendant, taking into comprehensive account the defendant's age, sex, criminal conduct, family relationship, environment, background and result of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., and determine the punishment as ordered by the Disposition.

arrow