logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.03.12 2019고단2735
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall induce a child or youth to buy sex or have him/her sell sex in order to boost sex of a child or youth.

On September 2019, the defendant, at the bus stops in front of the C party branch located in Jeju-si, Jeju-si, 2019, seeed the victim D (13 years old) who is a child or juvenile waiting for a bus with school uniform, and seeed as "Adoc scars, liaison", and 10,000 won in cash and contact information of the defendant became an opportunity for contact with the victim.

On September 18, 2019, the Defendant would give KRW 200,000 when making telephone conversations with the victim at no more than E on September 17, 2019;

내가 돈을 주면 너는 몸뚱이로 때우면 되는 거다, 내일 F모텔에 가자'고 하였으나 피해자가 위 모텔에 오지 않아 성매수를 하지 못하였다.

As a result, the defendant provided money to the victims who are children and juveniles and recommended them to sell sex.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning G and D;

1. 내사보고(H학교 방문 � 피해자와 면담 관련), 내사보고(피내사자와 피해자 간의 문자내역 및 통화내역 녹취록 첨부 관련), 각 CD, 수사보고(피의자 A의 휴대전화 디지털포렌식 관련), 수사보고(피의자가 제출한 자료 관련) 법령의 적용

1. Article 13 (2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, which provides relevant legal assistance to facts constituting an offense and is selected as a penalty;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The main sentence of Article 21 (2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. On the other hand, while issuing an employment restriction order, the defendant is not in the position of "protector" under the Child Welfare Act against the targeted child or juvenile, and the crime is not a "child abuse-related crime" under the Child Welfare Act, and the defendant is not a person subject to the employment restriction order

Article 3 subparagraph 3, Article 7-2, and Article 29-3 (1) of the Child Welfare Act.

arrow