Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged of this case is that the Defendant: (a) on December 29, 2016, around 23:55, on the front side of “C cafeteria” in the “C cafeteria”; (b) on the front side of the “C cafeteria”; (c) on the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle located at the Defendant’s vehicle seat at the Defendant’s vehicle seat at the Defendant’s vehicle seat; (d) the victim D (e.g., an acting driver on behalf of the Defendant (49 years of age) was to receive a proxy fee from the Defendant’s daily driving; and (e) on two occasions the victim’s face with his left hand; (e) the victim reported 112, and (e) the victim landed from the said vehicle.
Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz.
“In doing so, the victim abused the victim, such as smugglinging the victim’s chest due to his head.”
2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the same Act. According to the written agreement that the Defendant withdrawn on May 12, 2017, the victim D expressed his/her wish not to punish the Defendant on April 28, 2017, after the instant indictment was instituted. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed in accordance with Article 326(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.