Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On May 29, 2017, the summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant passed since 10:30 on May 29, 2017, the victim D (the age of 48) was no longer than d, while she set a taxi that he/she operates in front of the Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, and withdrawal of rest together with his/her fee article.
C) on the ground that he without permission made the word “,” he she took a bath to “I am for the same year as that of I am for I am for the same year, I am for the same year,” and assaulted with the floor of the hand and the drinking, when I am for the victim’s entrance.
2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the same Act. According to the head of the withdrawal of a complaint withdrawn on August 31, 2017, the victim, after the institution of the instant indictment, expressed his/her wish not to punish the Defendant on August 31, 2017, which is the date of the institution of the instant indictment, the prosecution in the instant case is dismissed pursuant to Article 326(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.