Text
1. The defendant shall provide the plaintiff with the real estate listed in the attached list (the left-hand part of the second floor on the ground plan).
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On the basis of the current status of multi-household 4 floor of Macheon-si C’s reinforced concrete structure (hereinafter “multi-household 4”) the entrance on the right side is indicated as A-101, A-201, A-301, A-401, and A-402, while the entrance on the left side is indicated as A-102, A-202, A-302, A-402, and A-402.
B. The real estate listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant real estate”) is the left-hand part of the second floor on the basis of the stairs attached to the collective building ledger, and is marked “A-202” on the entrance.
C. On April 13, 2001, the Plaintiff: (a) awarded a successful bid to the instant real estate that was owned by the Support Housing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”); and (b) completed the registration of ownership transfer on the instant real estate on April 26, 201.
On June 17, 1995, the Defendant concluded a lease contract with a deposit of 32 million won for the non-party company and multi-household 202 (hereinafter “instant lease contract”), but received the instant real estate around June 1995, and completed the move-in report as of February 27, 1997.
Since then, the defendant continued to occupy the real estate of this case.
E. Monthly rent is KRW 3,50,000 if there is no security deposit for multi-household No. 202.
[Ground of recognition] The non-contentious facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3 through 8 (including branch numbers), each fact inquiry results against the Korea Asset Management Corporation and Jung-gu District Court, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, unless there are circumstances to deem that the plaintiff succeeded to the status of the lessor under the lease agreement of this case, the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate of this case to the plaintiff seeking the exclusion of disturbance as the owner of the real estate of this case.