A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 11, 2017, the Defendant driven a fenz CLA250 vehicle in the section of about 200 meters from the 200-meter radius to the front road, with no driver’s license around 00:25 on September 11, 2017, while under the influence of alcohol at 0.138% of the alcohol content in blood, the Defendant driven a fenz CLA250 vehicle in the section of about 200 meters from the front road.

2. On September 11, 2017, the Defendant, such as the electronic records of the company, and the electronic records of the above writers, displayed the personal information of “I” on the road in front of the KT creative branch office set forth in paragraph (1) around 00:32, which was under the influence of drinking, when the Defendant was requested by the superintendent H of the police station G belonging to the Changwon G in charge of drinking control to take a alcohol test and to present human information.

The above H continuously demanded that the notice of the result of the influence on drinking driving of a portable information device (PDA), was signed by the Defendant without authority in the signature column of the short-term screen.

Therefore, for the purpose of handling administrative affairs, the Defendant, who is an electronic record of another person's electronic records on proof of fact, has forged the part of the first signature of the notification file of the results of driving control, which is an electronic record of facts, and had the above H submit the report to the said H as if it was duly formed and transmitted it to the traffic police computer network.

3. The Defendant shall enter the personal information of the Defendant “I” in the “written report on the circumstances of the driver at home” for the purpose of uttering at the same time and place as paragraph 2, and shall have diced to the Defendant’s meeting to the degree of 2 remaining in the driver’s opinion column.

The signature was written and submitted to H by stating “A”, etc.

As a result, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, has forged a report on the situation of the driver in the name of I, which is a private document concerning the proof of facts, and submitted it to the above H as if it had been duly formed.