logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.05 2017나13938
주위토지통행권확인 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: in Part 2, No. 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the results of fact inquiry into South-North Korea by this court" is added; in Part 4, No. 17 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "each entry" is used as "each entry, witness F of the court of first instance, and the result of on-site inspection by this court"; in Part 9, No. 9-1, No. 10, No. 11, No. 11, and No. 13-1 through No. 4, No. 12, and No. 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the evidence submitted by the plaintiff at the court of first instance, which are insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion, are the same as the part of the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding the part of the land of this case, for which the plaintiff reduced its claim for fact-finding by the court of first instance).

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and all appeals against the Defendants by the Plaintiff are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow