1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following to Chapter 5, Chapter 17, of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is consistent with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary Provisions] The building permission date of the instant building is clearly indicated as January 24, 1975, and the approval date of use on November 21, 1975. The entry in Gap evidence No. 6 (No. 21, 1975, Nov. 21, 1975) (No. 82, the date of commencement of construction) on the right upper right upper part of the recording No. 6 appears to be a clerical error in light of the part of new construction on November 21, 1975 at the left bottom and the fact-finding response results of the first instance court on August 19, 2015 to the head of Ulsan Metropolitan City of the first instance court and the purport of all pleadings.

(5) According to the result of on-site inspection conducted by the court of first instance, it may be confirmed that there is no extension that can be confirmed from the outer wall and inner wall of this case with the land.

6) Each statement of Gap evidence Nos. 12 through 21 and part of witness F of the party trial witness F submitted by the plaintiff in the party trial are all related to the commercial part of the building in this case, and it is difficult to view that it is directly related to the apartment including the building in this case No. 701.

A person shall be appointed.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and all appeals against the Defendants by the Plaintiff are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.