logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.19 2016나39780
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the part concerning the counterclaim of the judgment of the court of first instance, the amount of additional payments order is the same.

Reasons

1. The scope of the judgment in this Court is limited to the part of the counterclaim claim extended and reduced in the trial by the defendant, since the first instance dismissed the principal claim and partly accepted the counterclaim claim. The defendant only filed an appeal and extended and reduced the purport of the counterclaim in the trial.

2. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: (i) around September 11, 2013; (ii) around 13,220,96 won [23,676,949 won - Plaintiff 10,67,46,852 won [16, 16, 30, 465 won [23,67, 476, 479 won - 10, 476, 465 won [20, 36, 465 won [3, 40, 465 won [3, 500 won] of the first instance judgment; (iii) the total amount of 196, 47, 949 won of the non-negotiable goods sold to the Defendant at the time of termination; and (iv) the total amount of 23,676,949 won of the non-negotiable goods sold to the Defendant]; and (iv) the amount of less than KRW 2636,7636,29636,7,7.

arrow