logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.19 2017고단7976
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 9, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Incheon District Court, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On November 29, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Jung-gu Seoul District Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's High Court's Decision on March 12, 2014, and was sentenced to a one-year imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving of Drinking), and the execution of the sentence was completed on March 1, 2015.

"2017 Highest 7976"

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the business of driving Cone Star vehicles in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Risk Driving).

On August 17, 2017, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.345% during blood transfusions on August 17, 2017, while normal driving is difficult, and driven the said vehicle along the three-lane road in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E in the direction of a private distance, regardless of whether the said three-lane road is used in the alternate distance protection area or in the direction of a private distance.

In such cases, drivers are prohibited from driving under the influence of alcohol, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering and brakes and accurately.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant, by negligence, caused the victim F (41 Do) driver’s Gpoter vehicle in front of the same lane, to shock the part behind the Defendant’s vehicle into the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and caused the said Gpoter vehicle to shock the victim H(51 Do) driver’s vehicle in front of the signal signal.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, sustained injury to the above victim F in need of approximately two weeks’ medical treatment, and suffered injury to the victim H, such as salt pane, tension, etc. in need of approximately four weeks’ medical treatment.

2...

arrow