logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.09.21 2017고단3005
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 12, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of 2.5 million won on December 27, 2002 to a fine of 1 million won on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Jung-gu District Court of the Republic of Korea on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 8 months; (b) the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 10 months by imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the same court on October 17, 2007; and (c) on March 4, 2003, the Seoul Northern District Court issued a summary order of 2.5 million won on December 27, 2002 to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving).

1. Around June 13, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (breathing) driven a Dworket car under the influence of alcohol by 0.118% in a section of approximately 100 meters from the front of the monthly and underground vehicular road in Nowon-gu, Seoul to the front road in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving a Drocketing car.

On June 13, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol, as described in paragraph 1 of around 22:16, along with three-lanes from the upstream of the road in front of Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, to the intersection of the month from the downstream of the river in Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

At night and at night there are an intersection where signal apparatus was installed at the front, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by emphasizing the situation of the front side and operating the brake accurately and safely.

Nevertheless, while under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant did not discover the first car by driving F F, which was driven by the victim E (54 years old) who was in the atmosphere of the signal at the front of the vehicle, and received the part of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle behind the vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant's negligence in the above business so that it is necessary to give approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim.

arrow