logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2016.05.13 2016고단212
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 13, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1,50,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the Suwon District Court on February 13, 2015. On April 27, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1,50,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1,00,00 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) in the same court on July 8, 2015. On July 30, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving without a license) and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3,00,000 for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a spatic spatic car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Egres from Accidents) and the Road Traffic Act (Egres from Accidents).

On April 3, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.161% during blood transfusions on April 23:15, 2016, while driving the said car, and driving the front of the E-lane D at the time of racing along the two-lanes from the border distance of the East Ambassador to the e-lane distance.

At the time, the lower surface was milched, and the traffic signal was installed in the front bank, and the vehicles were waiting for the signal by red signal, so the Defendant engaged in driving motor vehicles had a duty of care to operate the brake system with a sufficient time to avoid accidents by operating the brake system.

Nevertheless, the defendant's negligence by neglecting the operation of the brake system in the above influence of drinking, and then late later, the part concerning the Gystyna taxi back of the victim F (53 Do) who was waiting at the front of the passenger car was taken as the front part of the defendant's vehicle, and the part concerning the 1st half of the victim's H(33 Do) driver who continued to stand in the signal at the front of the above taxi is the front part of the defendant's vehicle.

arrow