1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 31,129,600 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from March 2, 2014 to August 27, 2015; and (b).

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is the chief director who operates D Child Care Centers in Jin-si C (hereinafter “Child Care Centers in this case”) and the Plaintiff’s wife E is the chief director of the Child Care Center in this case.

From March 2013 to February 13, 2014, the Defendant served as infant care teachers from the Felbians of the instant child care center from March 2013 to February 13, 2014.

B. On February 13, 2014, around 13:00 on February 13, 2014, the Defendant: (a) took out and went out of the FJs; (b) prevented the Plaintiff; and (c) caused a dispute with the Plaintiff and E, and (d) took place a door and sound.

The defendant entered an empty FJ Class, and prepared a written resignation from the plaintiff after leaving the door, and then called the plaintiff to the police, and filed a criminal complaint against the plaintiff as a charge of insult, and E as an assault.

C. On the same day, at around 17:00, the Defendant was investigated by going to the police station as the above accusation case, and then published an article four times as shown in the attached list, stating that the Plaintiff and E, at the first floor of the Jinjin Police Station, engaged in unjust conduct, such as giving the instant child care center children and the Defendant a bath and assault.

G Privacy is one of the nine parents of the members of the F Team in charge of the Defendant and the Defendant, and the article posted on G Privacy is only one of the members of the G Privacy.

E. Meanwhile, on February 17, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a criminal complaint against the Defendant on the charge of obstruction of business with the following purport: “The Defendant, on February 13, 2013, caused the instant child-care center to put bareboatly and put his/her parents into the bareboat, inciting his/her parents.”

F. On April 28, 2014, with respect to the case in which the Defendant filed a complaint, the Plaintiff was rendered a non-prosecution decision as to the offense of insult, by insufficient evidence as to the facts of the offense of assault, E was not suspected.

On the other hand, the defendant's information and communication network on April 30, 2014 with respect to the case on which the plaintiff filed a complaint.