1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is a company that manufactures plant design, etc., and the defendant is a company that manufactures chemical machinery, etc.

B. On May 15, 2007, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant on July 30, 2007, with the terms that the Plaintiff would make up two of the waste heat recovery and disposal equipment (HRG HE) to US$ 3,530,00, and that the Plaintiff would make up until May 25, 2008 the delivery date and deliver it to the LAE to the Defendant. 2) The Plaintiff again entered into a subcontract with the Defendant on March 30, 2007, with the terms that the Plaintiff would make up for the production of HRP, which is a component of the waste heat recovery and disposal equipment, to the Defendant on March 15, 2008.

C. The Plaintiff’s design 1) The above contract was designed by the Defendant to manufacture and supply the HP as the Plaintiff’s design. According to the Plaintiff’s design, the Plaintiff’s design, the shape of the HP’s upper part and the lower part of the HP was in the shape of “consecting the HP to approach the surface of the HP. 2). Also, the HP design drawing offered by the Plaintiff to the Defendant was designed to be closely adhered to the HP’s design drawing without any gap between the HP end and the HP.

1) The Defendant’s delivery 2 Hap two Hap (hereinafter “each Hap of this case”) pursuant to the above subcontract.

(2) After the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff have produced and completed various inspections from inspectors of the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff supplied them to the Plaintiff on April 23, 2008. (2) The Plaintiff supplied the waste heat recovery system installed with each of the instant cargo units to the Plaintiff ABA.

E. On October 9, 2009, I discovered that water leakage occurs in the course of operating the waste heat recovery and disposal system at a trial on October 9, 2009.

F. An inspection conducted by the Corporation for the settlement of accounts with respect to the contact department was conducted from October 12, 2009 to December 21, 2009, and the inspection was conducted on the contact department in each of the instant cargo units.