1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the Plaintiff, which orders additional payment, shall be revoked.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment, except for the addition of some of the following, thereby citing this in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The third part of the judgment of the court of first instance is examined.

After the second two paragraphs of this subsection, “HTRG” is added to “(this is a waste heat recovery boiler device to recover the heat of the remaining gas emissions and produce electricity to recover the heat of the first gas from liquid natural gas or liquefied petroleum gas at Heat General, complex thermal power plant, and to recover the heat of the gas and to recover the heat of the remaining gas emissions, and to produce electricity to return the bracks of the second team using a steam higher than the atmosphere pressure.”

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff is obligated to pay the collection amount of KRW 263,618,774 according to the collection order of this case and the delay damages.

No claims asserted by the Defendant as automatic claims against the offset cannot be recognized, and some of them may be established even if so.

Even if the scope of the plaintiff's right to collect according to the collection order is not limited to the amount of the execution claim, but limited to the amount of the seized claim 700 million won, so the amount of the plaintiff's claim should be accepted within the scope of the remaining seized claim after offset.

B. The Defendant’s claim for unjust enrichment amounting to KRW 775,864,637 in total, damages, and settlement amount (i.e., unjust enrichment amounting to KRW 153,400,000 due to excessive appropriation of expenses incurred in installing Creins, and ② unjust enrichment amounting to KRW 12,015,90 in return for retirement income tax and resident tax refund amounting to KRW 12,015,627, and ③ F organization (hereinafter “F”).

487,954,139 won due to default on obligations related to certification or illegal acts, and ④ settlement amount of 122,092,971 won due to the reduction of H work contract amount in Crow, which shall be offset against the outstanding amount and the amount equal to the outstanding amount.

Accordingly, the plaintiff according to the collection order of this case.