logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원서부지원 2015.07.07 2014가단17750
건물명도등
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. The defendant B and the piracy Co., Ltd. shall be jointly and severally, and the attached Form 2.3 of the buildings listed in the list 1.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

On May 25, 2013, the Plaintiff leased the lease deposit of KRW 15 million and KRW 150,000,000 per month of rent to Defendant Seap Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Co., Ltd.”) on the 3rd floor of the building listed in the list (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”) as shown in attached Table 1.

On May 27, 2013, the Plaintiff leased part 3.0,000 square meters among the fourth floor of the instant building to Defendant C Co., Ltd. on May 27, 2013, and part 87.5 square meters among the attached Table 3.0,000 square meters among the four floors of the instant building on July 25, 2013 to Defendant D Co., Ltd. on each lease deposit, KRW 5,00,000 (payment on May 25, 201, value-added tax separately).

On October 15, 2013, the Plaintiff leased the lease deposit of KRW 175,00,000,000,000 monthly rent of KRW 70,000,00,000 from the fifth floor of the instant building to the rhym of Defendant Stock Exchange on the 5th floor of the instant building.

On August 25, 2013, the Plaintiff leased to Defendant D Co., Ltd. the part 175 square meters in attached Table 5. Drawings (A) among the six floors of the instant building, to KRW 10 million in lease deposit and KRW 700,000 in rent monthly (payment on August 25, 2013, and value-added tax separate).

On November 7, 2013, the Plaintiff leased a lease deposit of KRW 175,00,000 won and KRW 650,000,000,000 won per each month (the payment on January 25, 201, and the value-added tax separate), among the 7th floor of the instant building, to Defendant Seapow, Co., Ltd.

Defendant B agreed to operate the remainder of the Defendants (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) and pay the Plaintiff the difference between the Defendant Company and the Plaintiff.

The defendant company's cancellation of a lease agreement and the possession status of the defendant company did not pay more than 2 years the rent under each of the above lease agreements, and accordingly, a duplicate of the complaint of this case containing the plaintiff's expression of intent to terminate the above lease agreement.

arrow