The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment with prison labor, one year of suspended sentence, and 40 hours of taking lectures for sexual assault treatment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is the first offender, and the defendant is recognized as committing a crime, and is against the law.

The victim does not want punishment in consultation with the victim.

On the other hand, the crime of this case is likely to be criticized because it committed an indecent act and detained by inducing the subordinate staff in the workplace to the telecom.

Considering the time, place, etc. of the crime, the victim seems to have spawn considerable fear.

In full view of such circumstances as well as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the crime, various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant pleadings, such as the circumstances after the crime, it is difficult to view the lower court’s punishment too unreasonable.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.