The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below (the imprisonment for four months, one year of suspended sentence, one year of community service, 40 hours, and 40 hours of lecture for sexual assault treatment) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment is recognized and reflected in the crime, and that it is the primary offender is favorable.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant committed an indecent act continuously and continuously committed an indecent act by avoiding indecent act; (b) there is a significant possibility of criticism; (c) the victim appears to have been suffering from considerable sense of sexual humiliation and fear; (d) the victim wants to punish the Defendant; (c) there is no special change in circumstances after the decision of the lower court was made; and (d) there is no other reason of change in circumstances; and (e) there are conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, sex behavior, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, it is difficult to view that the lower

Therefore, we do not accept the above argument of the defendant's above sentencing.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.