A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On September 2, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for criminal fraud at the Seoul Western District Court for six months, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 12, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On April 2013, the Defendant, who received money by deceiving D that he would take over (State)C, had the Defendant undergo an investigation at the Seoul Seodaemun Police Station in question, and had the Defendant failed to comply with D’s promise, following the change in the following: (a) the Defendant got the investigation at the Seoul Seodaemun Police Station; and (b) the Defendant had the intention to escape from criminal punishment: (c) the Defendant was merely unable to comply with D’s promise.

On April 2013, the defendant prepared a false complaint against E with the aim of having E receive criminal punishment from an attorney-at-law office located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F.

In order to take the (ju)C from the complainant’s name, “Defendant E forged one copy of the minutes of the shareholders’ meeting in the name of the complainant on September 15, 2012, and one copy of the (ju) C meeting of the complainant on September 2012. Around that time, the Seoul Central District Court had a public official in charge of the Seoul Central District Court enter and exercise the false facts in the certified transcript of the corporate register of the authentic document by using the forged document, and then arbitrarily transferred the shares owned by the complainant and the shares owned by G, thereby causing damage equivalent to KRW 390 million in the amount of KRW 30 million in the (ju)C. After that time, the Defendant complained of the receipt in the name of the complainant on December 15, 2012 as if the complainant was paid by the Defendant, and forged one receipt in the name of the complainant on December 15, 2012, exercising the above forged receipt to H, and embezzled by arbitrarily borrowing the amount of KRW 70 million in the capital of Section C.”

However, in fact, around September 2012, the complainant was actually transferred (ju)C to E, and the defendant was dismissed from office due to the expiration of his term of office, and there was no auditor's resignation from the beginning, and the minutes of the general meeting of shareholders were prepared as true and the receipt was also prepared directly by the defendant, and E made the contribution of the (ju)C.