A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

. The loan transaction agreement was duly formed as a document. This was exercised as if the contract were duly formed.

B. On February 2, 2012, the Defendant, at the office of the said Vietnam Capital Loan Co., Ltd., Ltd., presented a forged loan transaction agreement, by deceiving an employee who had been aware of the name of the said company as C, and thereby deceiving the said employee, he/she obtained KRW 2 million from the victim Vietnam Loan Co., Ltd. on the same day and acquired it under the name of loan.

2. The crime related to “stock company’s immediate reflive loan”;

A. On or around February 2, 2012, at a place where it is difficult to know about the forgery of private documents and the uttering of the aforementioned investigation document 1) the Defendant forged one “loan Transaction Agreement” in the name of “C”, “C,00,000” in the loan column, and “D” in the resident registration number column and address column “C” ********” in the mobile phone number column, and signed the “F” and “C” in the name of “B” and “B” in the name of “B” and “C” with the intent to exercise its rights and duties, and then, the Defendant forged one copy of the “Loan Contract” in the name of “B”, which is a private document on the rights and obligations, and then, the Defendant cannot be seen as the Defendant’s use of the above certificate of forgery in the name of “F” in the name of “BE 201” in the “BE 201, the name of the said company and exercised the certificate of forgery 201.”