logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.01.22 2018구합65638
손실보상금
Text

1. As to KRW 55,790,200 and KRW 1,000 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 55,790,200 from May 25, 2018 to June 20, 2018.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project name: 1) Project approval and announcement: Public announcement of project implementation authorization for B housing redevelopment rearrangement project: The defendant; C ( July 23, 2015) public notification at Ansan-si; D ( January 15, 2016) public notification at Ansan-si;

B. Objects to be expropriated by the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on April 9, 2018: Land and obstacles (hereinafter “instant land”) indicated in the attached Form and “the obstacles of this case”

(2) The date of commencement of expropriation: Compensation for losses: 1,357,636,50 won (the instant obstacles of KRW 1,204,267,00) (the instant obstacles of KRW 153,369,50) 4): The appraisal corporation: E, E, stock company, and F [based] without any dispute; evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including branch numbers) and Eul’s evidence Nos. 1 through 4, the purport of the whole pleadings, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Determination

A. Since the amount of compensation determined by the Plaintiff’s instant expropriation ruling falls short of the market price, the Defendant is obligated to pay the difference between the reasonable compensation and the above compensation amount to the Plaintiff.

B. The facts of recognition 1) The instant land is located in the vicinity of H elementary school located in Ansan-si, G, and is located in the southwest-gu, G, and is located in the vicinity of the Gu, and the surrounding land is a flag housing zone consisting of general housing, small apartment complex, small-scale building, multi-household housing, and neighborhood living facilities, and traffic conditions are difficult, which is used as a bridge-type land, and is used as a main building site, such as a substitute, and is being used as a building site, and is designated as a Class 2 general residential area under the National Land Planning and Utilization Act and the Enforcement Decree thereof. 2) The court appraiser and the appraiser of the expropriation ruling are designated as a court and the appraiser of the expropriation ruling as a general residential area under the National Land Planning and Utilization Act, located in the vicinity of the instant land, and are the same as the specific use area and the surrounding environment are the same or similar, and the amount of compensation for the instant land was calculated

3. The court appraiser and the appraiser for the expropriation ruling shall have the structure, status of use, area, term of life, utility, possibility of transfer and transfer of the obstacles of this case.

arrow