The judgment of the first instance court, including the plaintiffs' claims expanded in the trial, shall be modified as follows:

Defendant.

Basic Facts

The relevant plaintiffs B are the wife of the deceased (KW, hereinafter referred to as the "the deceased"), the plaintiff C, and D, who are children of the deceased.

Defendant Incorporated Foundation E is a corporation that establishes and operates a G hospital located in Gangseo-si L (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) (hereinafter “Defendant Incorporated”) and Defendant F is an intention to operate a branch guard located in Gangseo-si H I (hereinafter “Defendant Council member”).

As of 2008, the deceased suffered from urology for more than 30 years, such as spathic history of the deceased and the progress of treatment at the Defendant Council members, etc., and for more than 10 years ago, they have been subject to pharmacologic on each of the symptoms above, indicating high blood pressure symptoms.

From around 2003, the deceased was receiving medical treatment from Defendant F because he was admitted to the Defendant’s member near the residence. The deceased had been subject to pharmacologic treatment, such as dynacule dyecule dyecule dyecule dye dyecule, and dyecule dye dye dyecule dyecule at the Seoul National University Hospital on February 13, 2004 due to the overall measures of Defendant F. The deceased had been subject to dyecule dye

As above, the Deceased was treated by Defendant F at any time during the period of outpatient medical treatment in Seoul National University Hospital. The contents of the treatment were prescribed in insulin from urology, and when there were symptoms, such as insulin, outpatients, and fathers, it was difficult for the Deceased National University Hospital to control urology and perform other pharmacologic treatment until the next outpatient treatment. In the process, Defendant F was difficult to prepare and send to the doctor of the Seoul National University University University Hospital, a statement of opinion or a meology stating the progress of the treatment from time to time.

On April 14, 2008, the deceased complained of hiddenly supporting symptoms, and the defendant F was confirmed as a result of the examination of the chest X-ray, and as a result of the examination of the chest X-ray, the above symptoms were caused by the heart of the deceased.