1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. On June 16, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted by the parties: (a) lent KRW 20 million to the Defendant as a deposit money; (b) however, the Defendant lent KRW 100,000 to the Defendant on August 26, 2014; and (c) the same year.

9. 1.1.1.1.1. 1. The defendant asserts that he should pay a total of KRW 1.2 million to the plaintiff the remaining loan amount of KRW 18.8 million. The defendant has received the above KRW 20 million from the plaintiff. However, the above money is alleged to the purport that the defendant's husband would not be held liable for civil or criminal liability against the plaintiff with regard to the occurrence of a livering event between the plaintiff and the defendant. 2. The plaintiff's assertion that even if there is no dispute as to the fact that there is a number of money between the parties to the judgment, the plaintiff has the burden of proof as to such lending (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2013Da73179, Sept. 15, 2015). The defendant's assertion that the defendant lent KRW 200,000,000 to the defendant's account in the name of the defendant's 2.1.6 billion, but it is not acknowledged that the plaintiff loaned the money to the defendant.