logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.05.28 2015고단515
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 15, 201, the criminal defendant against the victim C was issued KRW 20 million from the victim, on the following grounds: “Around November 15, 2011, the defendant borrowed money to the victim C at a mutually infinite restaurant located in the city of the head of the city in Busan-gun, the head of the city, the head of the city, the head of the city, or the head of the bank would return the money to the victim C.”

However, at the time, there was no intention or ability to repay the debt equivalent to KRW 300 million even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim because there was no property in the name of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant was given KRW 20 million by deceiving the victim.

2. On February 1, 2012, the Defendant against the victim D was transferred KRW 40 million to the Agricultural Cooperative (E) account in the name of the Defendant, on the false statement that “A bank would lend money to the victim D with a higher interest than its own interest on the loan.”

However, at the time, there was no intention or ability to repay the debt equivalent to KRW 300 million even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim because there was no property in the name of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant received, from August 1, 2014, a total of KRW 68 million from that time, including the Defendant’s receipt of KRW 40 million by deceiving the victim, from that time to August 1, 2014.

3. On May 3, 2013, the criminal defendant against the victim F was transferred KRW 4.8 million to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the criminal defendant (E) at the beauty art room operated by the victim in Ulsan on May 3, 2013, stating that the victim F would repay the money to the victim F.

However, at the time, there was no intention or ability to repay the debt equivalent to KRW 300 million even if the defendant borrowed money from the victim because there was no property in the name of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant belongs to the victim.

arrow