1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The party-related Plaintiff A is a patient who was treated by Tea Hospital operated by Defendant Educational Foundation C (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and Plaintiff B is an infant of Plaintiff A.

From November 1, 1993 to October 23, 2010, Defendant D is the neurosis and doctor of the Defendant hospital in charge of treating the Plaintiff’s Teinson’s disease, and Defendant C is the employer of Defendant D.

B. On November 1, 1993, Plaintiff A asserted that there was a dynamic phenomenon that does not temporarily fall into the ground when walking on the ground on the ground of the symptoms of the left-hand hand and the sloping of the bridge, which started on November 1, 1993. As a result, Defendant D’s diagnosis conducted a neological examination, Defendant D diagnosed that Plaintiff A suffered from the son’s disease at the end of the second period or the third period of the second period of the disease, and prescribed that the e-mail, which was the e-mail system, was the e-mail system from November 11, 1993, which had no particular effect even after the Plaintiff prescribed and administered the e-mail system.

3) On January 7, 1994, Plaintiff A complained of frequent dynamics with Defendant D, and observe simple dynamics movement certificates. Defendant D, at the time of initial treatment, was presumed to have been more than three years prior to the Plaintiff’s symptoms, when considering that Plaintiff A already fell under at least a mid-term pinson’s disease at the time of initial treatment, and that there was an abnormal exercise certificate from the early administration of Lesson’s disease at the time of initial treatment, Plaintiff A could have been presumed to have been longer than three years prior to the Plaintiff’s symptoms, i.e., the Plaintiff’s disease at the time of initial treatment. Plaintiff A was treated from February 1994 to April 200 after receiving outpatient treatment from around February 7, 1994, and was treated at the intervals of one month, but Defendant D was treated at the intervals of one month without any other big problems.

The number of uniforms per day was 150 g at the beginning, but symptoms are serious.